skip to Main Content
Premises Liability: Who Is Responsible For An Injury?

Premises Liability: Who Is Responsible for an Injury?

A tenant living on the third floor of an apartment building is walking down the same flight of stairs they take every day. They know that on the second level, a certain step has been creaking for months. 

Only this time, when they step on it, the stair tread finally gives way. 

The tenant falls down the stairs and suffers significant injuries: a broken wrist, a back injury, and a head injury from tumbling down multiple steps. 

For the tenant, it’s been a life-altering injury. But for the landlord and their property management company, it becomes a very serious legal matter. 

Premises liability cases like this are extremely common in California, but who is liable and who can be sued isn’t always clear. 

Landlord Premises Liability for Unsafe Property

In California, property owners and their property managers are required to exercise reasonable care to maintain a reasonably safe environment. They have a duty to take reasonable steps to inspect their properties for dangerous conditions and to repair them within a reasonable time. 

Failing to meet that standard of care, which could be failing to warn tenants or protect the general public about dangerous conditions, can result in landlord premises liability for unsafe property. An example would be making a repair that requires tearing up the sidewalk, failing to mark the construction properly, and having someone walking on the sidewalk at night fall into the hole and hurt themselves.

When these cases reach trial, courts evaluate them on a variety of factors. 

The court will see the triable issue as not whether or not the accident was preventable. The question is whether the owner or their management controlled the property or its condition, failed to use reasonable care, and whether that failure was a substantial factor in causing the injury.

If the property owner had reasonable knowledge of the hazard, it likely could have been prevented. 

In the example of the tenant who fell down the stairs, if the damaged step had already been reported, the landlord could have foreseen the accident and prevented the injury by repairing the step. 

These details matter because they show how much control a property owner or landlord, and their management company, had in preventing the injury. Liability in these cases is fact-specific and often turns on knowledge and ability to correct the problem.

On the other hand, if an injury occurs directly in an apartment due to hazardous conditions and the landlord had no knowledge of the condition, it would be much harder to hold them liable. The issue will become a problem if the property owner or their management should have known. Do they regularly go to their property to look for potential problems? If they have not been to the property in years, that could be an issue.

Expert testimony can help a judge or jury understand how these factors affect liability.

Who is Liable in Premises Liability Cases?

Determining liability isn’t always simple, but it usually falls on one of four parties.

  • Property owners and landlords: Under California law, property owners are required to maintain safe conditions on their properties. They must be in compliance with building codes and address safety concerns in a reasonable time frame. 
  • Property Managers: Those who manage properties on behalf of the owner are agents of the owner. They can be held responsible for habitability obligations. If they fail to address known defects or those they should have known about, they may be liable for accidents. 
  • Tenants: Under premises liability law, tenants themselves may be liable for conditions in areas that they directly lease or control. These areas are typically off-limits to landlords and property managers unless a landlord gives advance notice of the need to enter. If a dangerous condition exists within their leased space, it is the tenant’s responsibility to notify the landlord or property owner so the issue can be addressed. 
  • Third-party vendors: Under certain circumstances, third-party vendors may be liable for injuries or damages if negligent work creates hazardous conditions. For example, if a repairman is called in to fix an air conditioner and drops tools from the roof, injuring someone, they may be held liable for the damages. 

Determining who is responsible in a premises liability case often overlaps with negligence and habitability concepts, and these distinctions matter. That’s why both defense and plaintiff attorneys often rely on expert witness testimony from experienced property managers and building code experts to clarify technical obligations and real-world standards of reasonable care. 

Edrington & Associates is frequently called upon to provide litigation consulting and, when needed, expert witness testimony in premises liability cases. 

How the Right Expert Can Shift a Premises Liability Case

Most juries don’t have practical knowledge of habitability standards, building codes, or other key factors in premises liability cases. That’s why they need someone who can clearly and objectively explain the facts. 

That makes expert witness testimony a powerful method of shaping how a jury interprets the facts of a case. 

At Edrington & Associates, our expert witness services are grounded in decades of real estate practice as landlords and property managers.

That experience allows us to speak to juries and provide clear explanations of industry standards and legal duties. We can speak to inspection standards, maintenance practices, and habitability evaluations. 

We interpret building and safety codes so it becomes clear to a jury whether a landlord has met the required standard of care. 

And because our expert testimony is backed by years of experience, we present credible, balanced testimony that withstands cross-examination.

As real estate expert witnesses, we have been trusted by both plaintiffs and defense counsel. We explain uncommon things to the trier of fact, regardless of which side hires us.

Premises Liability and Dangerous Property Conditions: Practical Risk-Reduction Guidance For Clients

Attorneys representing property owners should advise them on practical steps they can take to reduce their premises liability.

  1. Conduct and document routine inspections

    This is one of the most effective ways landlords and property owners can prevent premises liability claims. Routine inspections of common areas, including sidewalks and staircases, help identify hazards before someone gets hurt. Inspections should be well-documented. This serves as vital evidence that a landlord or property manager has met their standard of care.

  2. Respond promptly to safety and repair requests

    When a tenant does make a safety or repair request, they should be responded to as quickly as possible. Ideally, the issue should be addressed as quickly as reasonably required if it is brought to the property owner’s or management’s attention. Communication with tenants is key, so that they are aware of the hazard and can avoid it until it is repaired. Documenting the communications is vital.

  3. Maintain code compliance

    A major factor in premises liability cases is whether a property is in compliance with building and other codes. Property owners should ensure their properties comply with applicable codes and habitability standards. If work is required, it often requires a permit, which requires an inspection by the authority having jurisdiction to ensure the work meets code requirements. This generally, but not automatically, indicates that the work meets the minimum requirements of the law and is an important piece of evidence.

  4. Preserve maintenance logs and tenant communications

    Communications with tenants become a vital piece of evidence in a premises liability case. Communication logs show when an issue was brought to the landlord’s attention and document the repair response time. Maintenance logs also provide a credible source of evidence that reasonable steps were taken to keep a property safe.

  5. Maintain sufficient liability insurance

    Property owners should always be advised to keep sufficient liability insurance to support them if a claim is made. Insurance is an essential safety net. Without it, losing a premises liability case can have significant financial implications. Make sure you understand what is covered and what is excluded from the policy. Getting the correct coverage can be difficult.

Why Choose Edrington & Associates for Expert Witness Testimony?

A credible, knowledgeable expert witness can shape a jury’s interpretation of the evidence. 

Attorneys choose Edrington & Associates because we bring decades of real-world property management experience to each case. 

Our expertise spans multifamily, commercial, and residential assets. We have extensive knowledge of California construction and building codes. 

Our testimony is clear and persuasive, and capable of withstanding cross-examination. We have a significant track record of providing compelling courtroom testimony that can influence judges’ and juries’ decisions.

Edrington & Associates can help you bridge the gap between complex legal standards and real-world property management practices. 

Premises Liability Isn’t Always Straightforward: Edrington & Associates Can Help Bring Clarity

Most premises liability cases boil down to one key question: who is responsible for the dangerous conditions that caused an injury? Is the closing argument at trial, “if the landlord had taken reasonable steps to address the issue, we wouldn’t be here today?”

As we’ve seen, it isn’t always clear who the responsible party is. Liability can lie with property owners, property managers, third parties, and even tenants themselves. 

When a premises liability injury occurs, determining liability often depends on the details and the evidence supporting them. 

How long the condition existed, whether the landlord or property manager knew about it, and whether or not reasonable steps were taken to fix it all factor heavily into a jury’s decision. 

Helping a jury or judge to understand these issues often requires real-world experience in property management and maintenance standards. That’s where the testimony of an expert witness makes a huge difference. 

Edrington & Associates regularly helps attorneys clearly explain the property owner and their property manager’s responsibilities in premises liability cases to judges and juries. We can help determine whether an injury resulted from negligence or whether reasonable care was given. 

If you’re handling a premises liability claim, you need clear, credible expert insight. Contact Edrington & Associates today to discuss the details of your case and learn how our expert witness testimony can support your strategy.

Back To Top